Sciweavers

1912 search results - page 70 / 383
» On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
Sort
View
JANCL
2008
109views more  JANCL 2008»
15 years 6 months ago
Conditionalization and total knowledge
This paper employs epistemic logic to investigate the philosophical foundations of Bayesian updating in belief revision. By Bayesian updating, we understand the tenet that an agen...
Ian Pratt-Hartmann
NDJFL
2010
15 years 29 days ago
Polyadic Quantification via Denoting Concepts
The question of the origin of polyadic expressivity is explored and the results are brought to bear on Bertrand Russell's 1903 theory of denoting concepts, which is the main o...
Ori Simchen
PRICAI
2004
Springer
15 years 11 months ago
Text Classification Using Belief Augmented Frames
: In this paper we present our work on applying Belief Augmented Frames to the text classification problem. We formulate the problem in two alternative ways, and we evaluate the pe...
Colin Keng-Yan Tan
DAWAK
2009
Springer
15 years 10 months ago
Arguing from Experience to Classifying Noisy Data
A process, based on argumentation theory, is described for classifying very noisy data. More specifically a process founded on a concept called “arguing from experience” is des...
Maya Wardeh, Frans Coenen, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capo...
FLAIRS
2007
15 years 8 months ago
Interpretive Reasoning with Hypothetical Cases
Reasoning with hypothetical cases helps decision-makers evaluate alternate hypotheses for deciding a case. The hypotheticals demonstrate the sensitivity of a hypothesis to apparen...
Kevin D. Ashley