Sciweavers

1912 search results - page 34 / 383
» On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
Sort
View
JELIA
2010
Springer
15 years 4 months ago
Sets of Boolean Connectives That Make Argumentation Easier
Abstract. Many proposals for logic-based formalizations of argumentation consider an argument as a pair (Φ, α), where the support Φ is understood as a minimal consistent subset ...
Nadia Creignou, Johannes Schmidt, Michael Thomas, ...
KR
2000
Springer
15 years 9 months ago
Finding Admissible and Preferred Arguments Can be Very Hard
Bondarenko et al. have recently proposed an extension of the argumentation-theoretic semantics of admissible and preferred arguments, originally proposed for logic programming onl...
Yannis Dimopoulos, Bernhard Nebel, Francesca Toni
AAAI
2007
15 years 8 months ago
Action-Based Alternating Transition Systems for Arguments about Action
This paper presents a formalism to describe practical reasoning in terms of an Action-based Alternating Transition System (AATS). The starting point is a previously specified acc...
Katie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
ATAL
2009
Springer
16 years 20 days ago
Dialogues that account for different perspectives in collaborative argumentation
It is often the case that agents within a system have distinct types of knowledge. Furthermore, whilst common goals may be agreed upon, the particular representations of the indiv...
Elizabeth Black, Katie Atkinson
DEON
2010
Springer
15 years 11 months ago
Value-Based Argumentation for Justifying Compliance
Compliance is often achieved ‘by design’ through a coherent system of controls consisting of information systems and procedures . This system-based control requires a new appro...
Brigitte Burgemeestre, Joris Hulstijn, Yao-Hua Tan