383 search results - page 37 / 77 » On the bipolarity in argumentation frameworks |
138
click to vote
MICAI
2005
Springer
15 years 11 months ago
2005
Springer
In this paper we describe a human organ selection process in which agents argue over whether a given donor’s organ is viable for transplantation. This process is framed in the CA...
269
click to vote
AGENTCL
2003
Springer
15 years 11 months ago
2003
Springer
This paper proposes a formal framework which offers an external representation of conversations between conversational agents. Using this formalism allows us: (1) to represent the ...
195
click to vote
COMMA
2006
15 years 7 months ago
2006
In this paper we discuss the integration of two systems that are based on a specific theory of argumentation: the first, an existing web-based discussion forum; the second, a metho...
142
click to vote
UAI
1993
15 years 7 months ago
1993
: This paper presents and discusses several methods for reasoning from inconsistent knowledge bases. A so-called argumentative-consequence relation, taking into account the existen...
158
click to vote
AAAI
2007
15 years 8 months ago
2007
Here, we define a framework where defeasible argumentation is used for reasoning about beliefs, desires and intentions. A dialectical filtering process is introduced to obtain a...